Репозиторий Университета

AIM: To evaluate bile ducts injuries and effect of biliary decompression technique on the outcomes of reconstructive surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 21 patients with biliary injury during cholecystectomy, 20 patients with cholelithiasis, and 1 patient after surgery for perforated duodenal ulcer. Their age was 22-81 years (mean 54.3 years). Primary surgery through median laparotomy was followed by biliary injury in 12 patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy - in 6 patients, open laparoscopy - in 3 patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In group 1 (n=11) biliary injury was diagnosed intraoperatively, in group 2 (n=10) - in 2-11 days after primary procedure. According to European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) 2013 classification biliary injury type 1 was found in 5 patients, type 2 - in 9 cases, high damage involving confluence (type 3) - in 1 patient, type 4 - in 1 patient, and type 6 - in 5 patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 3 patients revealed that biliary drainage output after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was caused by cystic duct clipping failure, endoscopic papillosphincterotomy was successfully used for biliary drainage output (type 6). In 3 patients operated through median laparotomy biliary excretion cessation was observed after 2-3 days that indicated damage of aberrant bile ducts. RESULTS: Bile outflow into gastrointestinal tract was restored in 11 out of 16 patients with iatrogenic biliary injury types 1-4, external biliary drainage was used in 4 patients due to their severe condition and abdominal inflammatory changes. Biliary fistulae occurred in 5 out of 8 patients in both groups after primary reconstructive surgery. Biliary stricture was observed in 3 cases due to external biliary drainage failure followed by peritonitis. 7 patients underwent reconstructive surgery with positive result. Mortality was absent. In 1 patient with biliary fistula outcome is unknown. CONCLUSION: Transumbilical biliary drainage is optimal during reconstructive surgery.

© 2018 Russian Photodynamic Association. All rights reserved. Currently, reconstructive-plastic surgery is becoming the standard for surgical and combined treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients. With a one-stage reconstruction of the breast, the use of biological implants that can replace muscle autografts and, consequently, reduce trauma, blood loss and operation time, and also to avoid defects in the donor zones is becoming topical. From 2014 to 2017, 151 reconstructive operations on 121 patients with BC (average age 41.5 years) using synthetic and biological materials were carried out in P.Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute. 0 stage of BC TisN0M0 was diagnosed in 11 (9.1%) patients, I stage - in 52 (42.9%), IIA - in 41 (33.9%), IIB - in 9 (7.4%), IIIA - in 4 (3.3%), IIIB - in 2 (1.7%), IIIC - in 2 (1.7%). To strengthen the lower slope, a biological implant - Permacol acellular dermal matrix, was used in 34 cases. Cosmetic result was rated as excellent in 20 (58.9%) cases, good in 11 (32.3%), unsatisfactory in 3 (8,8%). Biological materials are an important addition to various options for breast reconstruction. The criterion for selecting the material for strengthening the lower slope of the breast with subcutaneous or cutaneous mastectomy for cancer with a one-stage reconstruction using a silicone endoprosthesis is the pinch-test value.